Poverty in Third World Countries free essay sample

Helping poor people is ethical behavior and everyone should do it in order to continue our lives. Every year, there are millions of people at risk of going hungry. There are ways people can end poverty all around the world. People can eliminate poverty if we work together to fight it and avoid selfishness. Rich countries often give financial aid to poor countries, but it does not solve poverty. People always say they feel sorry for poor people and the rich love them, but they never do their part. People do not prevent themselves from buying things that are not necessary to them. That money could be donated to people who are in need of it. There are many people in rich countries living a luxurious life, while others in poor countries are starving but cannot find anything to eat. People in rich countries are buying more than their needs. For example, many teenagers in developed countries have more than one video game. We will write a custom essay sample on Poverty in Third World Countries or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page People also buy too much clothes that they are not using. The proper way of helping poor people, just give them only what they are need such as foods and money, or educational experiences from developed countries which helps them to change their situations. Food and money are going to run out, but education and experience never run out. The kinds of education and experiences that would help the poor: teaching sustainable agriculture, planting trees, and teaching them how to use their resources. â€Å"Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day; teach him how to fish and he will eat for the rest of his days. † Rich nations must provide poor nations the elements and the possibility to develop themselves. In contrast, Developed nations want poor nations to remain as they are: poor. In order to control them, they have a dependent relationship, and determine their economic situations. In both reading â€Å"Lifeboat Ethics,† and â€Å"The singer solution to world poverty,† they argue about wealth helping the poor. In â€Å"Lifeboat Ethics,† Garrett Hardin suggests that rich countries teach poor countries to â€Å"build their own boat. † Moreover, Hardin explains that poor nations will always be taking food from the Food Bank, which makes them unmotivated to improve their status. In the reading â€Å"The singer solution to world poverty,† Peter Singer states that organizations should take money from rich countries which spend on luxurious items and instead donate it to help needy people. Hardin point is more important because he depicts what is the proper way to help poor nations by helping them to â€Å"build their own boat. † There are three points explain that Hardin’s ideas about the proper way of helping the poor. The first is the homeless have the same opportunity as rich people have, and the rich should help the homeless. The second is people should share their resources with those in hardship situations. The third is developed countries must help undeveloped countries with health, trade, and education, because those are concept of any developing countries. First of all, the homeless have the same opportunities as financial stable people have. Financial stable people should help the homeless. There is a serious problem with the way homeless people are treated. They are not treated as any normal human beings are treated. Within my own experience, I used to contribute to a nonprofit organization called â€Å"FTFT. † This organization seeks to alleviate the suffering of the neediest in our communities, who deal with disease, hunger, and loneliness. The organization visits homeless shelters and assist them in serving their residents. The FTFT gives me the opportunity to meet many homeless people. In the beginning, I was weary of them, but once I treated them I realized that most of them are very kind. However, I had a question. Why don’t the homeless go to find a job as I do? One day, I attempted to find out an answer. I started to ask some of them, why you do not go to find a job in order to change your life’s situations? Moreover, the streets in winter months are very cold. They are not proper for living. Some of the homeless said that they tried many times to look for any job, but they did not find any. The reason is they are trouble to acquire a job without a home address. Furthermore, most of businessmen think that the homeless are untrustworthy people, which become another obstacle, for them to change their life situations. Also, their lack of education becomes a main reason of their problems to find a job. The homeless have been dubbed the outcasts of society. On the other hand, many of the homeless could obtain jobs, but they chose not to. The reason is they always find help from some organizations and individuals, which makes them lazier. The best thing organizations could do with the homeless, organizations give them money and foods and likewise make them contribute in organizations, which gives the homeless opportunities to live normal lives. Indeed, the public should do something, because the homeless are a large part of our society. The public must work together to end their suffering as much as possible. In the essay â€Å"The Singer Solution to World Poverty,† by Peter Singer illustrates that the main idea of how we can end the homeless problems by saying that American people spend almost one third of their income on things not important to them. Additionally, Singer claims that â€Å"By his calculation, $200 in donations would help a sickly two- years-old transform into a healthy six year old, offering safe passage through childhoods most dangerous year. † the government must give the homeless new opportunities to change their lives by finding jobs and educating them which helps them to contribute our community. Also, government should help the other homeless who have mental health problems. As a matter of fact, Natural resources are belonging to humanity. Since we all have to face this is energy crisis, we should share our natural resources justly. This is what should be done with whole countries around the world. All world resources such as oil, coal and natural gas should be distributed equally between rich Countries and poor Countries regardless of borders. Natural resources are not made by humans. They are a part of the planet we all live on. Therefore, these resources should be equally distributed between all countries. In our world, there are many people believe in that all we are humans and we are a part of the planet. I think that this is way it going to be beneficial for the rich countries also, because poor countries have many natural resources such as African countries, but there are lacking of education which made them poor. That is why there are many organizations work worldwide to help the other countries who face a hardship. One of these organizations is the world food bank, which is helping people worldwide. Additionally, UNICEF and Oxfam America are nonprofits organizations are working to help people around the world. In the essay â€Å"Lifeboat Ethics,† by Garrett Hardin states that advantages and disadvantages the world food bank. The advantages are rich countries that have overflowing of their grain deposit, and poor countries would draw independent on what they needs. On the other hand, disadvantages of sharing is selfishness of some countries are asking for more than their needs, or some developed countries do not want to share their resources with others. It means that there will always be someone looking to take advantage of the commons. Hardin asks But does everyone on the Earth have an equal right to an equal share of its resources? † If the answer is yes, why we have some poor countries and some rich countries? To help the destitute nation doesn’t mean giving money to them. As an old proverb goes, â€Å"Teaching a man how to fish is better than giving him a fish. † developed countries should help those poor countries with education, medical and agriculture all of human beings are part of the earth. The public should help each other and make the world better. Developed countries should help undeveloped countries by given them proper experiences and education. Even though numerous countries have many resources, they are still poor, because they are lacking of experience and education. For example, Nigeria has a lot of natural resources such as gold and oil, but it still poor country. The reason is Nigeria has many groups, and each group has a different belief, which makes a war among each other. Moreover, Nigeria does not have enough experience of how they using their resources as well. Developed countries should give Nigeria their experience and proper education instead of money which helps them to change their hardship situations. Hardin asserts that â€Å"The modern approach to foreign aid stresses the export of technology and advice, rather than money and food. Developed countries should help undeveloped countries with health, trade, and education. Many third world countries do not have enough resources. That is why developed countries helping them to improve their live situations from many aspects, For example, health, education, and trade. However, the government of the third world countries should work hard in order to elements poverty in their region. But people find many governments of poor countries do not want to change themselves. They rely on the aids whatever comes from rich countries. Developed countries such as America have share of worlds natural, financial or their resources, but the poor countries must work side by side with rich countries in order to reduce poverty in their counties. The United States launches free educational programs for the third world countries in order to help them to improve their life situation such as upgrading the agrarian. The education is the only way can change a person’s life. An old proverb â€Å"The education is movement from the dark to the light. † That is why education is the best way for helping poor countries.

Definition and Examples of Prewriting Strategies

Definition and Examples of Prewriting Strategies In composition, the term prewriting refers to  any activity that helps a writer think about a topic, determine a purpose, analyze an audience, and prepare to write. Prewriting is closely related to the art of invention in classical rhetoric. The objective of  prewriting, according to Roger Caswell and Brenda Mahler, is  to prepare students for writing by allowing them to discover what they know and what else they need to know. Prewriting invites exploration and promotes the motivation to write (Strategies for Teaching Writing, 2004). Because various kinds of writing (such as note-taking,  listing, and freewriting) usually occur during this stage of the writing process, the term  prewriting  is somewhat misleading. A number of teachers and researchers prefer the term exploratory writing. See Examples and Observations below. Also, see: Writing ProcessComposingDiscovery Strategies (Heuristics)FocusingGeorge Carlin on Finding Something to Write AboutYour Writing: Private and Public Types of Prewriting Activities BrainstormingClusteringFreewriting Journalists QuestionsJournal WritingListingOutlinePentadReading Examples and Observations Prewriting is  the getting ready to write stage. The traditional notion that writers have a topic completely thought out and ready to flow onto the page is ridiculous. Writers begin tentatively- talking, reading, brainstorming- to see what they know and in what direction they want to go. -Gail Tompkins, Rod Campbell, and David Green,  Literacy for the 21st Century. Pearson Australia, 2010Prewriting involves anything you do to help yourself decide what your central idea is or what details, examples, reasons, or content you will include. Freewriting, brainstorming, and clustering . . . are types of prewriting. Thinking, talking to other people, reading related material, outlining or organizing ideas- all are forms of prewriting. Obviously, you can prewrite at any time in the writing process. Whenever you want to think up new material, simply stop what you are doing and start using one of [these] techniques... -Stephen McDonald and William Salomone, The Writers Response, 5th ed. Wad sworth, 2012 The Aims of PrewritingUsually, the prewriting activities help you find a good topic, narrow topics that are too broad, and look at purpose. You should finish the prewriting activities with at least a sentence and a list. Or you may have something as formal as a three-part thesis sentence and a fully developed outline. Either way, youll have laid the groundwork. -Sharon Sorenson, Websters New World Student Writing Handbook. Wiley, 2010 Prewriting as a Method of DiscoveryJeannette Harris stresses prewriting while stating that discovery occurs throughout the composing process, even in revision, when the writer is still retrieving additional information, making further connections, recognizing emerging patterns [Expressive Discourse, 15]. In prewriting as well as free-writing and keeping journals, ideas and forms are discovered by provoking memory. In addition, the personal nature of much prewriting and freewriting serve as an affirmation that the memory of the student writer has a valid place in the writing classroom. -Janine Rider, The Writers Book of Memory: An Interdisciplinary Study for Writing Teachers. Routledge, 1995 Prewriting and Revising[P]rewriting plans are not carved in stone; they are simply tools for generating and organizing ideas. Writers frequently change their minds as they write, eliminating some details, adding and changing others. Thats why some writers say that prewriting is a misnomer; they return to their plans over and over during all stages of the writing process, often revising and adjusting the plans as they go. -Lori Jamison Rog,  Marvelous Minilessons for Teaching Intermediate Writing. International Reading Association, 2011